Anvil Media | Portland, OR - Integrated Marketing Agency
  • Services
    • Paid Media
    • SEO
    • Social Media
    • Email Marketing
    • Content Marketing
    • Customer Journey
    • Web Analytics
    • Website Development
  • Outcomes
    • Clients
    • Portfolio
    • Case Studies
    • Testimonials
    • Awards
    • Industry Expertise
  • Insights
    • Blog
    • White Papers
    • Webinars On-Demand
    • Articles
    • Marketing Cheat Sheets
    • eBooks
  • About
    • Our Philosophy
    • Our Culture
    • Executive Team
    • News & Events
    • Careers
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Anvil Newsletter
» Home » Blog » Future of News Interview
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Google

Future of News Interview

by Kent Lewis on September 28, 2009NewspaperOnline Publications

Future of News Interview

by Kent Lewis on September 28, 2009Newspaper

This interview is a part of a series where Anvil focuses on the future of news.  Please read The Future Newspaper & Social News and join the discussion on Twitter by adding the #futureofnews hashtag to your update. We also greatly appreciate any comments.

corporateblueSteve Woodward, the founder of Nozzl Media, sat down with Anvil to discuss the future of online publications and the news industry.  Nozzl Media builds local, real-time streams of news, and ads for newspapers, delivered as branded content on their websites.  Nozzl uses the mobile web, social media, micro-blogging and filtering technology to deliver a live, flowing, interactive stream accesible on any smart-phone or web page and filtered according to search terms and location.

Anvil: How do you get your news?

Steve Woodward: My daily general news sources are The Oregonian, the Huffington Post and (this is heresy for a former mainstream journalist) The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. I also subscribe to several daily e-mail newsletters and listservs for specialized topics such as mobile, social media and journalism.

A: If you had to put your money on one, who would win in a heads up battle: Digg or the New York Times?

Steve Woodward QuoteSW: To me, they co-exist peacefully in two very distinct niches. But if one were forced to choose between the two, I would go with the NYT.

Digg is a popularity contest, not really a “front page” — unless you’re talking about a front page of random, often weird, often trivial news. It’s fun, but does it support public discourse in a way that benefits democracy? Maybe it does, but that’s not its purpose.

The NYT, on the other hand, is a news product that is more than the sum of its parts. Individual stories may not be as entertaining or, at times, even as important as stories found on Digg. But taken as a whole, over time, the NYT gives its readers the unmistakable gestalt of the nation and its most important issues.

A: What are the barriers/entrenched ideas large content producers face in adapting to a digital medium?

SW: Large content producers are prisoners of their own past success.

Michael Nielsen had a fantastic post in June that came closer than anything I’ve ever read to explaining why entire industries run by smart, well-intentioned people can simply disappear. The best companies have created organizational “immune systems,” blocking out new ideas that threaten the traditional practices that led to their success. The example he gives is newspapers that spend hundreds of dollars sending Pulitzer Prize- winning photographers on assignments that may not even result in a single photo in the paper.

A blog, in contrast, can use a free handout photo. Yet the paper can’t simply start using handout photos, because its reputation and success are partially built on outstanding photography. So the organization is trapped by its inability to improve by making incremental changes and is stuck with unsupportable high costs. The only way out is to completely disrupt its own business and start over from scratch. Few executives will put their own jobs and the jobs of potentially hundreds of people on the line to attempt something so dramatic and so prone to failure. So they stick to what has succeeded in the past — and hope for a silver bullet.

A: Who is doing it well?

SW: The Bakersfield Californian has a long history of citizen journalism. Its home page features not only staff blogs, but also reader blogs, videos and reviews. The paper also launched successful industry-specific job sites. Its most famous initiative is Printcasting.com. The paper’s senior manager of digital products used a foundation grant and the paper’s own investment to create a site where citizens could build their own printed niche newspapers or magazines. The content comes from writers who contribute material through the site and share in a portion of the ad revenue.

The Las Vegas Review Journal went from zero to 60 on its website last year, blowing up a static, template-heavy existing site that was simply a repository for newspaper copy. Now it’s multimedia-centric. The paper also is participating in some interesting digital projects, such as the Digital Newsbook Publishing Project, which republishes multipart newspaper series as e-books.

The Lawrence (Kansas) Journal World & News was one of the first papers to create a nicely interactive site that didn’t look like the typical newspaper site with 10,000 links on the home page.

And of course, The New York Times has top-notch online and mobile people who produce great content and stunning interactive graphics. The Times also had a lot of foresight several years ago, when it bought into broadcast TV, not just for the money, but also so its print people could learn how to do video properly. As a result, they’re miles ahead of other papers, which are simply shoving video cameras into the hands of inadequately trained reporters and still photographers.

A: Anyone doing exceptionally poorly?

SW: Tough question. I’d have to say most newspapers do it poorly. I can’t think of any in particular that are SO bad they deserve to be called out more than the rest. Most are poorly designed for navigation and eye-tracking, have no discernible organizing principles, contain too many links and elements on the home page, hide their staff blogs, run annoying display ads that jiggle and flash, publish news in chronological order rather than order of importance, update news on a print schedule rather than immediately, make no distinction between writing for print and writing for web, post amateurish-looking, staff- shot video…. I could go on.

A: Aggregators have a notable advantage to content producers in that they don’t have to pay to develop the content.  How are content producers at an advantage over aggregators?

SW: I used to believe that aggregators were mostly a force for good, because they drove traffic back to the original content site. But studies show most readers are satisfied with a short hit on the aggregators’ sites and never click through for a fuller story. So I’m now ambivalent. Aggregators succeed because they provide a valuable reader service. Reader’s Digest, for instance, had a huge circulation for decades because it aggregated print content and made it easy for people to read multiple content sources under one cover. It seems to me that content producers, ironically, have to become their own aggregators for content that is specific to their local markets.

Say a newspaper prints a story about shenanigans by the mayor. The landing page for the story should include not only the story itself, but links to past stories from the newspaper’s archives, related articles and multimedia from other, even competing, publications, Twitter feeds, blog posts, commentary, polls, whatever you can think of. An aggregator may be able to “steal” someone else’s content, but they can’t steal context.

A: How do you see newspapers and magazines generating revenue in the future?

SW: If you look at the history of mass markets over the past 25 years, you see they’ve been wiped out by the twin forces of fragmentation and consolidation. Retail is a perfect example. Mass-market merchandisers like Meier & Frank are gone, replaced by tons of specialty retailers (fragmentation) and a few big-box, big-volume, low-price retailers such as Walmart (consolidation). Everything in the middle is mostly gone. Mass media are no different; the Internet enabled the decline to happen at a much more rapid pace, but it would have happened anyway.

So I see mass-market newspapers in local markets shrinking, with their readership migrating to a wide variety of niche media (fragmentation) and big-box media (consolidation).

In essence, magazines have already gone through this phase. Local niche media — catering to neighborhoods, interests, online readers and even print readers — will draw their revenue from low-cost local ad dollars, nonprofit grants, advocacy group sponsorship and revenue sources we haven’t even thought of yet. At the same time, the new Walmarts of media — Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, AOL and maybe even mainstream national papers such as the New York Times and Wall Street Journal — will become hybrid aggregators and content producers funded by national advertisers (consolidation). I can envision freelance journalists replacing staff journalists throughout the country. I can also envision entrepreneurs creating companies that employ reporters and editors and contract with both large and small media companies.

A: Any thoughts on Facebook’s announcement recently regarding FB Connect for mobile?

SW: I saw it as validation that mobile is going to be increasingly important in ways we can’t begin to understand. Facebook has more than 65 million active users on mobile, and those users are 50 percent more active on the site than non-mobile. I can’t help but think that mobile can change journalism just as it’s changing society. What will it mean to be a mobile journalist in the near future? I don’t know, but it will be exciting to find out.

A: If you started a newspaper today, where do you spend the bulk of your money allocated for content?

SW: I would spend much of it on investigative and explanatory journalism, which are expensive because of manpower but also vital to a healthy democracy. My approach would be to turn readers into assignment editors, asking them through polls, blog commentary or other means to help define what my newspaper should delve into. My reporters would post their daily reporting progress, source lists and source documents, allowing readers to add, comment, make suggestions. Every week, we would publish the results of the most recently completed investigation, both online and in print. The print edition would contain not only the major story, but also summaries of the week’s major news, including news broken by competitors. That would be how I would *spend* my money. Fortunately, you didn’t ask where I would *make* my money.

A: What could Nozzl do tomorrow to help a struggling local paper?  A national paper?  A monthly pub?

A struggling local paper can benefit several ways. First, local mobile advertising favors transactional advertising (coupons, sales, special

deals) and smaller advertisers over brand advertising, which tends to be the bailiwick of large advertisers that largely ignore local papers. Second, the sales staff can sell by CPMs, just as they do for online ads, avoiding the necessity for extensive new training. Third, Nozzl’s real-time, GPS and filtering technologies enable new sales products pegged to mobile search, locational advertising and trending topics that can be sold at set prices or by auction. Fourth, on the news side, the ability of our software to search thousands of public records, RSS feeds, calendars and websites gives the newsroom, in effect, hundreds of new reporters that can do routine newsgathering, freeing up the staff to do higher-value journalism.

A national paper can provide its mobile advertising clients with far easier tools with which to conduct national ad campaigns. Mobile advertising’s growth has been held back by the need to rent common short codes, optimize ads for thousands of different handsets, sign agreements with dozens of wireless carriers, and custom-design WAP landing pages, Nozzl’s in-line ad system turns each ad into more of a tweet, metatagged with keyword(s) and location, enabling it to flow into the streams of people who are following or searching for content with similar tags. A click on the ad takes the user to an automatically generated landing page populated with links for maps, phone numbers and social elements such as a “share” button.

Because our product is real-time, the highest value is for publications whose audiences expect them to be updating continually.

So a monthly publication is a tougher value proposition — but not impossible. Take Portland Monthly, which appeals to readers who, I imagine, spend big on entertainment and lifestyle purchases. A Nozzl- powered Portland Monthly site would contain lots of content targeted at the right demographic: restaurant reviews, events calendars, movie schedules. Each item in the stream would take the user to a Portland Monthly-branded landing page, where the magazine could sell more ads in addition to the ones it sells monthly in print

A: How does Nozzl differentiate itself from Eqentia, OpenCalais, and Evri?

SW: Our business model is quite different from any of these, particularly since we emphasize mobile delivery of advertising. Basically, our business model calls for us to be a white-label solution for newspapers and TV stations that want to provide not only their own content, but also aggregated content and public records that reside in databases in the deep web, where they are invisible to search engines. Eqentia, for now, has a limited number of topics to choose from, and most are tech- oriented. Evri is a cool site, although I like Kosmix better. But both Evri and Kosmix tend to be encyclopedic rather than real-time. If you unspooled our content from real time, took out the filters and geo-tagging and made a Nozzl Media-branded website out of it, it would probably resemble Evri or Kosmix in content. But that’s not what we’re trying to do.

As for OpenCalais, we think it’s awesome and are using it to help create metadata for our content.

  • Search
  • Recent Posts
    • Social Commerce: What Is It and How Can Your Brand Benefit From ItApril 25, 2018
    • Better Together: Why Your Brand Needs Both PPC and SEOApril 18, 2018
    • Boost SEO Content with Featured Snippets and Customer InsightsApril 11, 2018
    • A New Take on Big Brother: How Google is Creating a Secure Ecosystem for Digital AdvertisingApril 4, 2018
  • Categories
  • archives
    • 2018
      • Apr 2018
      • Mar 2018
      • Feb 2018
      • Jan 2018
    • 2017
      • Dec 2017
      • Nov 2017
      • Oct 2017
      • Sep 2017
      • Aug 2017
      • Jul 2017
      • Jun 2017
      • May 2017
      • Apr 2017
      • Mar 2017
      • Feb 2017
      • Jan 2017
    • 2016
      • Dec 2016
      • Nov 2016
      • Oct 2016
      • Sep 2016
      • Aug 2016
      • Jul 2016
      • Jun 2016
      • May 2016
      • Apr 2016
      • Mar 2016
      • Feb 2016
      • Jan 2016
    • 2015
      • Dec 2015
      • Sep 2015
      • Aug 2015
      • Jul 2015
      • Jun 2015
      • May 2015
      • Apr 2015
      • Mar 2015
      • Feb 2015
      • Jan 2015
    • 2014
      • Dec 2014
      • Nov 2014
      • Oct 2014
      • Sep 2014
      • Aug 2014
      • Jul 2014
      • Jun 2014
      • May 2014
      • Apr 2014
      • Mar 2014
      • Feb 2014
      • Jan 2014
    • 2013
      • Dec 2013
      • Oct 2013
      • Sep 2013
      • Jul 2013
      • Jun 2013
      • May 2013
      • Apr 2013
      • Mar 2013
      • Feb 2013
      • Jan 2013
    • 2012
      • Dec 2012
      • Nov 2012
      • Oct 2012
      • Sep 2012
      • Aug 2012
      • Jul 2012
      • Jun 2012
      • May 2012
      • Apr 2012
      • Mar 2012
      • Feb 2012
      • Jan 2012
    • 2011
      • Dec 2011
      • Nov 2011
      • Oct 2011
      • Sep 2011
      • Aug 2011
      • Jul 2011
      • Jun 2011
      • May 2011
      • Apr 2011
      • Mar 2011
      • Feb 2011
      • Jan 2011
    • 2010
      • Dec 2010
      • Nov 2010
      • Oct 2010
      • Sep 2010
      • Aug 2010
      • Jul 2010
      • Jun 2010
      • May 2010
      • Apr 2010
      • Mar 2010
      • Feb 2010
      • Jan 2010
    • 2009
      • Dec 2009
      • Nov 2009
      • Oct 2009
      • Sep 2009
      • Aug 2009
      • Jul 2009
      • Jun 2009
      • May 2009
      • Apr 2009
      • Mar 2009
      • Feb 2009
      • Jan 2009
    • 2008
      • Dec 2008
      • Nov 2008
      • Oct 2008
      • Sep 2008
      • Aug 2008
      • Jul 2008
      • May 2008
      • Apr 2008
      • Mar 2008
      • Feb 2008
      • Jan 2008
    • 2007
      • Dec 2007
      • Nov 2007
      • Oct 2007
      • Sep 2007
      • Aug 2007
      • Jul 2007
      • Jun 2007
      • May 2007
      • Apr 2007
      • Mar 2007
      • Feb 2007
    • 2006
      • Dec 2006
      • Nov 2006
      • Oct 2006
      • Sep 2006
      • Aug 2006
      • Jul 2006
      • Jun 2006
      • May 2006
      • Apr 2006
      • Mar 2006
      • Feb 2006
      • Jan 2006
    • 2005
      • Dec 2005
      • Nov 2005
      • Oct 2005
      • Sep 2005
      • Aug 2005
      • Jul 2005
      • Jun 2005
      • May 2005
      • Apr 2005
      • Mar 2005
      • Feb 2005
      • Jan 2005
    • 2004
      • Dec 2004
      • Nov 2004
      • Oct 2004
      • Sep 2004
      • Jul 2004
      • Jun 2004
      • May 2004
Ready to get started?

Take the next step toward growing your business. Tell us a little more about your goals and schedule an appointment.

Talk to Us

Blog

  • Social Commerce: What Is It and How Can Your Brand Benefit From It by Javier Sanchez on April 25, 2018
  • Better Together: Why Your Brand Needs Both PPC and SEO by Brett Myers on April 18, 2018

Twitter

Anvil Media, Inc. @anvilmedia

Numbers don't lie! Learn how you can use data from your #eCommerce store to help build your business: https://t.co/62LvmX4AYB

ReplyRetweetFavorite

Testimonials

We’ve been using Anvil for the past 12 months and since day one we have been thoroughly impressed with the ...

©Anvil Media, Inc. 2018
310 NE Failing St. Portland, OR 97212

  • About
  • Services
  • Outcomes
  • Contact
  • Legal
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linked in
  • Google+
  • Instagram
  • RSS